Invalid state transitions — reactivation without payment
1,240
from 0 · new
1,240
Vela Fintech AR · subscription lifecycle
—
Not a churn-bearing finding
4d 12h ago
24 Aug 02:20 UTC
Commercial integrity. Entitlement, payment, subscription lifecycle, invoicing.
Routing & discussion
Not routed yet. Nobody outside this tool knows about this finding.
No agreed intakeNo agreed intake. Tickets go to a named individual and are not tracked by AWG. The ticket will be recorded here with no external reference to quote back.
- Transitions not permitted by the lifecycle (3 rows)
Description
1,240 Vela Fintech AR subscriptions moved from CANCELED to ACTIVE with no payment event recorded between the two states. A further 88 show a double-billing pattern: two settled payments inside one cycle against a single subscription. Neither sequence should be possible under the documented lifecycle. The volume clusters in the four days following the August acquirer change, which is the same window as the resolved payment-failure finding — so the likeliest reading is a replay or retry artefact in the recovery rather than a standing defect.
Ask AWG billing whether the acquirer recovery replayed state events. If it did, this closes as an artefact; if it did not, 1,240 users are active without paying.
Related logs
2026-08-24T02:20:00.000ZS-8930 THRESHOLD RULE CANCELED → ACTIVE without payment — observed 1,240, expected 0new
- Detected
- 24 Aug 02:20 UTC4d 12h ago
- Detector
- Threshold rule
- Slice
- Vela Fintech AR
- Confidence
- 97%
- Affected users
- 1,240
- Observed
- 1,240
- Expected
- 0
- Deviation
- new
Event dataREDSHFTPOST /redshift-data/v1/statement200160mss-8930-00a78{ "timestamp": "2026-08-24T02:20:00.000Z", "endpoint": "POST /redshift-data/v1/statement", "requestId": "s-8930-00a78", "status": 200, "latencyMs": 160, "request": { "metric": "CANCELED → ACTIVE without payment", "slice": "Vela Fintech AR", "detector": "rule", "window": "6h" }, "response": { "observed": "1,240", "expected": "0", "deviation": "new", "confidence": 0.97, "affected_users": 1240, "columns": [ "from", "to", "count", "with payment" ], "rows": [ [ "CANCELED", "ACTIVE", "1,240", "0" ], [ "EXPIRED", "ACTIVE", "312", "0" ], [ "ACTIVE", "ACTIVE", "88", "88 (double)" ] ] } }QuerySELECT from_status, to_status, count(*) AS transitions, sum(has_payment::int) AS with_payment FROM recon.invalid_transitions WHERE tenant_id = 'vela-ar' AND occurred_at >= now() - interval '30 days' GROUP BY from_status, to_status ORDER BY transitions DESC
2026-08-24T02:20:00.000ZS-8933 THRESHOLD RULE Double billing inside one cycle — observed 88, expected 0new
- Detected
- 24 Aug 02:20 UTC4d 12h ago
- Detector
- Threshold rule
- Slice
- Vela Fintech AR
- Confidence
- 99%
- Affected users
- 88
- Observed
- 88
- Expected
- 0
- Deviation
- new
Event dataREDSHFTPOST /redshift-data/v1/statement200163mss-8933-00a7b{ "timestamp": "2026-08-24T02:20:00.000Z", "endpoint": "POST /redshift-data/v1/statement", "requestId": "s-8933-00a7b", "status": 200, "latencyMs": 163, "request": { "metric": "Double billing inside one cycle", "slice": "Vela Fintech AR", "detector": "rule", "window": "6h" }, "response": { "observed": "88", "expected": "0", "deviation": "new", "confidence": 0.99, "affected_users": 88, "columns": [ "from", "to", "count", "with payment" ], "rows": [ [ "CANCELED", "ACTIVE", "1,240", "0" ], [ "EXPIRED", "ACTIVE", "312", "0" ], [ "ACTIVE", "ACTIVE", "88", "88 (double)" ] ] } }QuerySELECT from_status, to_status, count(*) AS transitions, sum(has_payment::int) AS with_payment FROM recon.invalid_transitions WHERE tenant_id = 'vela-ar' AND occurred_at >= now() - interval '30 days' GROUP BY from_status, to_status ORDER BY transitions DESC
Clustered support tickets
No tickets matched.